Ohio’s attorney general, Dave Yost, filed a lawsuit on Tuesday in pursuit of a novel effort to have Google declared a public utility and topic to authorities regulation.
The lawsuit, which was filed in a Delaware County, Ohio court docket, seeks to use a legislation that’s over a century outdated to regulate Google by making use of a authorized designation traditionally used for railroads, electrical energy and the phone to the search engine.
“When you own the railroad or the electric company or the cellphone tower, you have to treat everyone the same and give everybody access,” Mr. Yost, a Republican, mentioned in a assertion. He added that Ohio was the primary state to convey such a lawsuit in opposition to Google.
If Google have been declared a so-called widespread provider like a utility firm, it might forestall the corporate from prioritizing its personal merchandise, companies and web sites in search outcomes.
Google mentioned it had not one of the attributes of a widespread provider that normally present a standardized service for a charge utilizing public property, comparable to rights of method.
The “lawsuit would make Google Search results worse and make it harder for small businesses to connect directly with customers,” José Castañeda, a Google spokesman, mentioned in a assertion. “Ohioans simply don’t want the government to run Google like a gas or electric company. This lawsuit has no basis in fact or law and we’ll defend ourselves against it in court.”
Though the Ohio lawsuit is a stretch, there may be a lengthy historical past of presidency management of sure sorts of corporations, mentioned Andrew Schwartzman, a senior fellow on the nonprofit Benton Institute for Broadband & Society. “Think of ‘The Canterbury Tales.’ Travelers needed a place to stay and eat on long road treks, and innkeepers were not allowed to deny them accommodations or rip them off,” he mentioned.
After a collection of federal lawsuits filed in opposition to Google final 12 months, Ohio’s lawsuit is a part of a subsequent wave of state actions geared toward regulating and curbing the ability of Big Tech. Also on Tuesday, Colorado’s legislature handed a information privateness legislation that may enable customers to decide out of knowledge assortment.
On Monday, New York’s Senate handed antitrust laws that may make it simpler for plaintiffs to sue dominant platforms for abuse of energy. After years of inaction in Congress with tech laws, states are beginning to fill the regulatory vacuum.
Ohio was also one of 38 states that filed an antitrust lawsuit in December accusing Google of being a monopoly and using its dominant position in internet search to squeeze out smaller rivals.