Healy’s best power is his eye for the procedural particulars — the who, what, when and the place of the Soul City story. Yet his e book is a misplaced alternative. “My goal in telling the story of Soul City is not to assign blame,” he writes. “It is to understand the forces that led to its downfall and the lessons it offers for the pursuit of racial equality today.” As somebody who has spent a profession writing about racial equality, I can promise you that it’s unattainable to additional that trigger with out assigning blame, and Healy’s reticence on this level finally makes Soul City a soulless e book.
One a part of the issue is Healy’s reluctance to contextualize the case of Soul City. He acknowledges racism typically however presents the gradual and inevitable collapse of the undertaking as if it had been separate from the broader phenomenon of institutionalized inequality. Nixon was a booster of Soul City, but it was his administration, via the grant-giving powers of the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, that offered the seed cash for the prison justice juggernaut that we at the moment are working to dismantle. Under Nixon, the company’s finances greater than tripled, to $850 million.
That Soul City’s destiny is immediately sure up with this growth is clear in the truth that, although the city’s residential neighborhoods had been by no means accomplished and at this time solely about 200 individuals reside in them, Soul Tech I is now a producing plant for janitorial provides that depends on the labor of prisoners at a close-by correctional facility.
But there are different implications of Healy’s procedural method. We are too hardly ever given entry to the inner lives of the principle characters throughout their most attempting moments. For instance, the phrase “soul” in Soul City was a serious impediment to McKissick’s efforts to entice funding from main corporations like General Motors. Such firms perceived the phrase as “too Black,” even separatist, and thus seemingly to scare off potential white residents (Soul City was meant to be Black-run however residentially built-in).
McKissick refused to change the identify till it was too late. His connection to the phrase was seemingly multifaceted, however its significance within the e book is unwittingly commandeered by this racist grievance. It isn’t till the epilogue, when McKissick, determining life after heartbreak, takes up preaching, that we study he had all the time dreamed of being within the pulpit and lengthy held sturdy non secular sentiments. That this elementary trait is withheld from us till the top signifies that we’re disadvantaged of full information of McKissick and the context for his seemingly cussed refusal to abandon the identify “Soul City.”
Smaller issues abound as properly. Though Healy early invokes the truth that Soul City was situated close to Klan nation, he solely ever vaguely indicators that town confronted native racial resistance. And although he energetically describes a minor participant within the Watergate scandal as a “dirty trickster,” in some way the segregationist Senator Jesse Helms, who promised McKissick that he’d “kill Soul City,” isn’t known as what he was: a racist.
There is far to be realized in “Soul City” in regards to the information of the case. But if we would like to know what the undertaking meant on the time and what it ought to imply for us at this time, Healy’s e book offers extra of a motive to transfer on from relatively than linger on its pages.