A particular prosecutor tasked with reinvestigating the case towards Jussie Smollett has discovered that the Cook County state’s lawyer’s workplace didn’t violate the regulation in its dealing with of the case however did abuse its discretion in deciding to drop prices and put out false or deceptive public statements about why it did so.
The findings, revealed in a information launch on Monday, conclude the investigation by the particular prosecutor, Dan Okay. Webb, who was appointed final 12 months after a choose dominated that the state’s lawyer, Kim Foxx, had not correctly dealt with the Smollett case the primary time. In February, Mr. Webb introduced grand jury had revived the felony case towards Mr. Smollett, indicting him on prices that he lied to the police in reference to an alleged hate crime assault towards him.
The second half of Mr. Webb’s investigation concerned figuring out whether or not any particular person or workplace engaged in wrongdoing whereas dealing with the Smollett case. In the information launch, Mr. Webb’s workplace mentioned that it unearthed proof that helps “substantial abuses of discretion and operational failures” by the state’s lawyer’s workplace in prosecuting the preliminary case in 2019.
Mr. Webb’s workplace discovered that legal professionals who work within the workplace’s felony division have been “surprised” or “shocked” by the phrases beneath which prosecutors dropped the fees towards Mr. Smollett, only a month after his arrest.
In explaining its resolution to drop the fees, the particular prosecutor discovered that the state’s lawyer’s workplace “breached its obligations of honesty and transparency” by making false statements reminiscent of its declare that Mr. Smollett was only one of 1000’s of defendants whose case had been referred for different prosecution. The state’s lawyer’s workplace couldn’t establish any particular circumstances on which it relied in deciding to drop the case towards Mr. Smollett, the particular prosecutor mentioned.
The particular prosecutor’s workplace is asking a choose to permit it to launch its full abstract of its ultimate conclusions. Ms. Foxx, whose workplace didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark, is up for re-election this fall.
A lawyer for Mr. Smollett, Mark Geragos, mentioned that he believed that the timing of the announcement appeared “politically motivated” towards Ms. Foxx, saying, “This is nothing more than an attempt to take down a young Black woman who doesn’t fit in with the white power structure.”
Mr. Webb’s workplace didn’t instantly reply to that allegation.