Quarterback Keeper? Jets, Browns and Bears Face Contract Decisions

The most pivotal resolution an N.F.L. workforce should make is commonly not drafting the appropriate quarterback however figuring out the appropriate factor to do with the quarterback it drafted just a few years in the past.

The Jets and Sam Darnold are reaching a crossroads. The Cleveland Browns and Chicago Bears are going through related choices with Baker Mayfield and Mitchell Trubisky. Should these groups provide their marginally spectacular, typically disappointing younger starters budget-burdening contracts or ship them away and begin over once more?

There isn’t any center floor. If there exists a compensation bundle for a former first-round quarterback that lands someplace between nine-figure golden handcuffs and bus fare out of city, N.F.L. entrance workplaces have but to find it.

Darnold, Mayfield and Trubisky have all made their groups’ choices trickier by enjoying effectively — however not that effectively — over the previous few weeks. Darnold has led the Jets to back-to-back victories. Mayfield threw 10 touchdowns and only one interception in a four-game stretch that ended when a coronavirus outbreak left him throwing to scout-team large receivers in Sunday’s loss to the Jets. Trubisky has accomplished over 70 % of his passes and thrown six touchdowns whereas main the Bears to 3 straight victories, albeit towards a trio of scuffling opponents.

The Bears declined Trubisky’s fifth-year option last off-season, so he enters 2021 as a free agent, leaving the team with several expensive, suboptimal choices. Franchise tagging Trubisky would cost the Bears more than the nearly $32 million one-year salary that Dak Prescott earned from the Dallas Cowboys’ indecision this season. A long-term contract may cost around $118 million over four years, as indicated by Ryan Tannehill’s contract with the Tennessee Titans. The cap-strapped Bears would struggle to afford either choice, neither of which Trubisky has earned.

Front-office politics could also play a role in the Bears’ decision. General Manager Ryan Pace famously traded a bundle of mid-round draft picks to the San Francisco 49ers in 2017 to select Trubisky when Patrick Mahomes and Deshaun Watson were still on the board. An executive who admits such a huge mistake rarely gets the chance to make another one. All the more reason to pretend that Trubisky is a late-blooming Aaron Rodgers.

Mayfield has outperformed Darnold and Trubisky, overcoming many youthful bad habits while leading the Browns to their first winning record since 2007. That makes the team’s next decision even more perilous. Mayfield appears to be in line for a contract in the $32 million to $40 million range per year, like those signed by Watson, Jared Goff and Carson Wentz in recent years. (Mahomes’s $500 million contract, like his entire career so far, belongs in its own category).

The Eagles, of course, have benched Wentz in favor of the rookie Jalen Hurts. But Wentz’s huge contract will make trading him like trying to sell a Lamborghini with 48 remaining payments after it was hit by a train. And Goff is the football equivalent of a $40 hamburger. Watson has played well in hopeless circumstances, and not every mammoth quarterback contract brings instant regret. But if the Browns choose to overpay Mayfield for “good enough,” they are likely to get precisely what they bargained for.

It’s easy to suggest that any team that is not completely satisfied with its young quarterback’s development should cut bait and dip instead into next year’s deep pool of can’t-miss rookies. But Darnold, Trubisky, Mayfield, Wentz and Goff all came from similar can’t-miss pools. If selecting and developing a franchise quarterback were easy, multiple teams would not face this predicament each year.

Ultimately, the Jets will probably trade or release Darnold; Mayfield should get Goff/Wentz money from the Browns; the Bears will find a solution to the Trubisky conundrum that makes sense only to the Bears; and everyone will wish they had selected Mahomes when they had the chance. The whole cycle will just begin anew next year when the Giants try to figure out what to do with Daniel Jones.

Source link Nytimes.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *