How Does the Coronavirus Compare With the Flu?


Is this new coronavirus actually a severe hazard? Doesn’t the flu kill extra individuals?

As the United States recorded its first coronavirus loss of life on Saturday — and as different circumstances popped up in individuals with out recognized dangers on the West Coast — Americans questioned methods to measure this new risk in opposition to a extra acquainted foe: influenza.

President Trump, a self-described germophobe, mentioned on Wednesday he was amazed to study that tens of 1000’s of Americans died from the flu every year, contrasting that quantity with the 60 or so recognized to be contaminated with the coronavirus. On Friday, Mr. Trump accused the information media and Democrats of exaggerating the risks of the virus.

“The flu kills people,” Mick Mulvaney, the appearing White House chief of employees, mentioned on Wednesday. “This is not Ebola. It’s not SARS, it’s not MERS. It’s not a death sentence.”

To many public well being officers, that argument misses the level.

Yes, the flu is horrible — that’s precisely why scientists don’t need one other contagious respiratory illness to take root. If they might cease the seasonal flu, they’d. But there might but be an opportunity to cease the coronavirus.

In some ways, the flu is the finest argument for throwing all the things at the coronavirus. Here’s a better have a look at the similarities and variations.

The coronavirus appears to be extra lethal than the flu — to date.

On common, seasonal flu strains kill about zero.1 % of people that turn out to be contaminated. The 1918 flu had an unusually excessive fatality price, round 2 %. Because it was so contagious, that flu killed tens of hundreds of thousands of individuals.

Early estimates of the coronavirus loss of life price from China, the epicenter of the outbreak, have been round 2 %. But a brand new report on 1,099 circumstances from many components of China, revealed on Friday in The New England Journal of Medicine, finds a decrease price: 1.four %.

The coronavirus loss of life price could also be even decrease, if — as most specialists suspect — there are lots of gentle or symptom-free circumstances that haven’t been detected.

The true loss of life price may turn out to be similar to that of a severe seasonal flu, below 1 percent, according to an editorial published in the journal by Dr. Anthony S. Fauci and Dr. H. Clifford Lane, of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Dr. Robert R. Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

But even a disease with a relatively low death rate can take a huge toll if enormous numbers of people catch it. As of Sunday, there were about 87,000 coronavirus cases and 3,000 deaths. This week, for the first time, the number of new cases outside China exceeded the number within the country.

Both the coronavirus and influenza are most dangerous to people who are older than 65, or have chronic illnesses or a weak immune system.

Death rates among men infected with the coronavirus in China, particularly those in their late 40s and older, have exceeded those among women, a pattern not seen in the seasonal flu. The reason for the discrepancy is not known, although Chinese men do smoke more, often resulting in compromised lung function.

By contrast, about 70 people in the United States have been infected with the new coronavirus, and there has been one death. There are no treatments or vaccines for the coronavirus, only supportive care for infected people.

Most cases of coronavirus infection are not severe, but some people do become quite sick. Data from the largest study of patients to date, conducted in China, suggests that of coronavirus patients receiving medical attention, 80 percent had mild infections, about 15 percent had severe illnesses, and 5 percent were critical.

The first symptoms, fever and cough, are similar to that of the flu, so the diseases can be hard to tell apart without a test to identify the virus. Pneumonia is common among coronavirus patients, even among those whose cases are not severe.

Experts think there may also be many people with no symptoms at all, or such mild ones that they never bother to seek medical attention. Because those cases have not been counted, it’s not possible now to know the real proportion of mild versus severe cases.

Antibody tests, which can determine whether someone has ever been infected, may eventually help to establish how many people had mild or asymptomatic coronavirus infections.

After viral infections, people generally develop antibodies in their blood that will fight off the virus and protect them from contracting it again. It’s reasonable to assume that people who have had the new coronavirus will become immune to it.

But it is not known how long that immunity will last. With other coronaviruses, which cause the common cold, immunity can wane.

There are vaccines for the seasonal flu, of course, and these induce at least partial immunity to influenza.

Even if the virus were to diminish in the spring, it might rebound later in the fall, as the weather cools. This is a pattern often seen in severe flu seasons.

Containment is becoming less likely, because of the contagiousness of the virus, the possibility that people can spread it before they have symptoms and the increasing number of outbreaks around the world.

The cases in California, Oregon and Washington State without known links to overseas travel, reported on Friday, may be a warning sign that the new coronavirus has already begun to circulate.

Reporting was contributed by Gina Kolata and Knvul Sheikh.



Source link Nytimes.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *